Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya • ISSN 2075-7999
peer-reviewed • open access journal
      

 

Muravyova O.I. The problem of using religious knowledge in psychology

Full text in Russian: Муравьёва О.И. Проблема использования религиозного знания в психологии
Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia

About author
Suggested citation


It is noted that the problem of axiological aspects of human psychology and psychological science is increasingly forcing researchers to access knowledge gained within the framework of religious traditions. The methodological foundations of positive psychology are analyzed. The author expresses concerns that non-critical and therefore irresponsible assimilation of knowledge gained within religious traditions can lead to deplorable and spiritually dangerous results. The thesis about the need for initiation of methodological responsibility principle for using religious knowledge in psychology is proposed. This principle involves an adequate conversion of concepts and provisions set forth within religious knowledge into scientific psychological discourse.

Keywords: value foundations of psychology, religious knowledge, positive psychology, methodological responsibility for using of religious knowledge

 

References

Averintsev S.S. In: Yu. B. Gippenreiter, A. A. Puzyrei, V. V. Arkhangelskaya (Eds.), Psikhologiya lichnosti. Moscow: AST: Astrel', 2009. pp. 211–215. (in Russian)

Albert H. Traktat o kriticheskom razume. I.Z.Shishkov, Trans. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2010. (in Russian)

Asmolov A.G. Psikhologiya lichnosti: Printsipy obshchepsikhologicheskogo analiza. Moscow: Smysl, 2001. (in Russian)

Batson G. Ekologiya razuma. Izbrannye stat'i po antropologii, psikhiatrii i epistemologii. D.Ya. Fedotov, M.P. Papush, Trans. Moscow: Smysl, 2000. (in Russian)

Bratus  B.S. Voprosy psikhologii. 1997, No. 5, 3–19. (in Russian)

Bulgakov S.N. Svet nevechernii. Sozertsaniya i umozreniya. St. Petersburg: Oleg Abyshko, 2008. (in Russian)

Ferrer H. Novyi vzglyad na transpersonal'nuyu teoriyu: Chelovecheskaya dukhovnost' s tochki zreniya souchastiya. A. Kiselev, Trans. Moscow: AST, 2004. (in Russian)

Foucault M. Germenevtika sub"ekta: Kurs lektsii, prochitannyi v Kollezh de Frans v 1981–1982 uchebnom godu. A.G. Pogonyailo, Trans. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2007. (in Russian)

Frankl V.E. Psychotherapy and Existentialism. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1967.

Fromm E. Iskusstvo lyubit'. L.V. Trubitsyna et al., Trans. St. Petersburg: Azbuka-klassika, 2004. (in Russian)

Galazhinsky E.V., Klochko V.Y. Psikhologiya innovatsionnogo povedeniya. Tomsk: Tomsk. gos. universitet, 2009. (in Russian)

Jung C.G. Analiticheskaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya. V.M. Leibin (Ed, Trans. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2001. (in Russian)

Kabrin V.I. In: V. V. Znakov, G. V. Zalevskii (Eds.), Tsennostnye osnovaniya psikhologicheskoi nauki i psikhologiya tsennostei. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2008. pp. 94–122. (in Russian)

Karandashev V.N. Metodika Shvartsa dlya izucheniya tsennostei lichnosti: kontseptsiya i metodicheskoe rukovodstvo. St. Petersburg: Rech', 2004. (in Russian)

Karandashev V.N. Voprosy psikhologii. 2009, No. 1, 81–96. (in Russian)

Klochko V.Y. Samoorganizatsiya v psikhologicheskikh sistemakh: problemy stanovleniya mental'nogo prostranstva lichnosti (vvedenie v transspektivnyi analiz). Tomsk: Tomsk. gos. universitet, 2005. (in Russian)

Klochko V.Y. In: V. V. Znakov, G. V. Zalevskii (Eds.), Tsennostnye osnovaniya psikhologicheskoi nauki i psikhologiya tsennostei. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2008. pp. 41–60. (in Russian)

Krichevets A.N. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. 2010, 7(4), 3–19. (in Russian)

Lacan J. Seminary, Kniga I: Raboty Freida po tekhnike psikhoanaliza (1953/54). M. Titova, A. Chernoglazov, Trans. M.: Gnozis, Logos, 1998. (in Russian)

Leahey T. Istoriya sovremennoi psikhologii. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2003. (in Russian)

Lebedeva A.A. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya, 2012, No. 2, 17–28.

Leontiev D.A. Psikhologiya smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoi real'nosti. 2nd, rev. ed. Moscow: Smysl, 2003. (in Russian)

Leontiev D.A. In:D. A. Leontiev (Ed.), Lichnostnyi potentsial: struktura i diagnostika. Moscow: Smysl, 2011. pp. 76–106. (in Russian)

Leontiev D.A. (Ed.). Lichnostnyi potentsial: struktura i diagnostika. Moscow: Smysl, 2011. (in Russian)

Mamchur E.A. In: Tsennostnye aspekty razvitiya nauki. Moscow: Nauka, 1990. pp. 81–94. (in Russian)

Martynova M.A., Bogomaz S.A. Vestnik TGU. 2012, No. 357, 164–168. (in Russian)

Nastoyashchee i budushchee rossiiskoi psikhologii: mneniya vedushchikh spetsialistov In: Natsional'nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2012, 1(7), 9–32. (in Russian)

Peterson C. A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Peterson C., Seligman M.E.P. (Eds.) Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Poddiakov A.N. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012, 2(22), 1. http://psystudy.ru (in Russian, abstr. in English)

Rokeach M. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press, 1973.

Ryff C.D. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1989, 57(6), 1069–1081.

Seligman M.E.P. Novaya pozitivnaya psikhologiya: Nauchnyi vzglyad na schast'e i smysl zhizni. Moscow: Sofiya, 2006. (in Russian)

Solodushkina M.V. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012, 5(24), 3. http://psystudy.ru (in Russian, abstr. in English)

Stepanov S.S. Vek psikhologii: imena i sud'by. Moscow: Eksmo, 2002. (in Russian)

Stetsenko A.P. Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya. 1990, No. 2, 39–49. (in Russian)

Tulchinskii G.L. Postchelovecheskaya personologiya. Novye perspektivy svobody i ratsional'nosti. St. Petersburg: Aleteiya, 2002. (in Russian)

Vasilyuk F.E. In: D.A.Leontiev, V.G.Shchur (Eds.). Psikhologiya s chelovecheskim litsom: gumanisticheskaya perspektiva v postsovetskoi psikhologii. Moscow: Smysl, 1997. (in Russian)

Vygotsky L.S. In: L. S. Vygotsky. Sobr. soch. in 6 vols. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1982. Vol. 1, pp. 291–436. (in Russian)

Yurevich A.V. In: In: V.V. Znakov, G.V. Zalevskii (Eds.), Tsennostnye osnovaniya psikhologicheskoi nauki i psikhologiya tsennostei. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2008. pp. 21–40. (in Russian)

Znakov V.V., Zalevskii G.V. (Eds.). Tsennostnye osnovaniya psikhologicheskoi nauki i psikhologiya tsennostei. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2008. (in Russian)

Received 15 January 2013. Date of publication: 23 February 2013.

About author

Muraviova Olga I. Ph.D., Associate Professor, Faculty of Psychology, Tomsk State University, pr. Lenina, 36, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Suggested citation

Muravyova O.I. The problem of using religious knowledge in psychology. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2013, Vol. 6, No. 27, p. 1. http://psystudy.ru (in Russian, abstr. in English).

Permanent URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/eng/2013v6n27e/823-muravyova27e.html

Back to top >>