Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya • ISSN 2075-7999
peer-reviewed • open access journal
      

 

Kotov A.A., Dagaev N.I. The role of background knowledge in the development of conceptual flexibility effect

Full text in Russian: Котов А.А., Дагаев Н.И. Роль предыдущих знаний в порождении эффекта понятийной гибкости
Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia

About authors
Suggested citation


The effect of conceptual flexibility involves inclusion of attributes that are irrelevant to the formed category in the concept and their further handling where required. The previous studies show that the conceptual flexibility effect arises while performing feature inference tasks and doesn’t arise while performing classification tasks. In the last case attention becomes too focused on one attribute. In the study the hypothesis according to which the conceptual flexibility effect may arise while performing classification tasks is tested on a sample of students (N=60). As this take place objects with attributes that are functionally connected and potentially related to semantic knowledge of the students are used as stimuli.

Keywords: concept, category, effect of conceptual flexibility, semantic memory, concept development

 

Funding

The study was conducted within Basic Research Program of the National Research University – Higher School of Economics for 2013 and supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic, project 13-06-00432.


References

Brooks L.R. Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances. In: Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978. pp. 169–211.

Cabrera A., Billman D. Language-driven concept learning: Deciphering Jabberwocky. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1996, 22(2), 539–555.

Carey S. The origin of concepts. Oxford: OUP, 2011.

Chin-Parker S., Ross B.H. The effect of category learning on sensitivity to within-category correlations. Memory and cognition, 2002, 30(3), 353–362.

Hoffman A.B., Rehder B. The costs of supervised classification: The effect of learning task on conceptual flexibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2010, 139(2), 319–340.

Kamin L.J. Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In: Punishment and aversive behavior. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1969. pp. 279–296.

Kruschke J. ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological review, 1992, 99(1), 22–44.

Lupyan G., Rakison D., McClelland J. Language is not Just for Talking: Redundant Labels Facilitate Learning of Novel Categories. Psychological Science, 2007, 18(12), 1077–1083.

Markman A.B., Ross B. H. Category use and category learning. Psychological Bulletin, 2003, No. 4, 592-613.

Murphy G., Allopenna P. The Locus of Knowledge Effects in Concept Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1994, 20(4), 904–919.

Murphy G.L. The big book of concepts. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004.

Murphy G.L., Medin D.L. The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 1985, 92(3), 289–316.

Nosofsky R. Similarity scaling and cognitive process models. Annual review of psychology, 1992, 43(1), 25–53.

Rescorla R.A., Wagner A.R. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: Classical conditioning: II. Current research and theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972. pp. 64–99.

Robinson C.W, Best C.A., Deng W., Sloutsky V.M. The role of words in cognitive tasks: What, when, and how? Frontiers in Psychology, 2012, 3, 1–8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00095

Shekhter M.S., Potapova A.Ya. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 1999, 20(2), 66–72. (in Russian)

Shepard R.N., Hovland C.I., Jenkins H.M. Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs, 1961, 75(13), 1–42.

Smith E.E., Grossman M. Multiple systems of category learning. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2008, 32, 249–264.

Yamauchi T., Markman A.B. Category learning by inference and classification. Journal of Memory and Language, 1998, 39, 124–48.

 Received 27 March 2013. Date of publication: 25 June 2013.

About authors

Kotov Aleksei A. Ph.D., Senior Research Associate, Cognitive Research Laboratory, Higher School Of Economics (National Research University), ul. Myasnitskaya, 20, 101000 Moscow, Russia.
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра., www.cogdevelopment.com

Dagaev Nikolai I. Ph.D. Student, L.S.Vygotsky Institute for Psychology, Russian State University for the Humanities, Miusskaya pl., 6, 125993 Moscow, Russia.
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Suggested citation

Kotov A.A., Dagaev N.I. The role of background knowledge in the development of conceptual flexibility effect. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2013, Vol. 6, No. 29, p. 7. http://psystudy.ru (in Russian, abstr. in English).

Permanent URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/eng/2013v6n29e/844-kotov29e.html

Back to top >>

Related Articles