Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya • ISSN 2075-7999
peer-reviewed • open access journal
      

 

Guseltseva M.S. Theoretical and methodological foundations of the harmonization processes of socialization, individualization and identity of the person in the conditions of transitive society


GUSELTSEVA  M.S. THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE HARMONIZATION PROCESSES OF SOCIALIZATION, INDIVIDUALIZATION AND IDENTITY OF THE PERSON IN THE CONDITIONS OF TRANSITIVE SOCIETY
Full text in Russian: Гусельцева М.С. Теоретико-методологические основы гармонизации процессов социализации, индивидуализации и идентичности личности в условиях транзитивного общества

Psychological institute, Moscow, Russia

About author
Suggested citation


In the context of the cultural-analytical approach shows that for the study of specific processes of socialization, individualization and identity of the person in the conditions of transitive society psychological science needs to develop adequate modern culture model in designing the methodology and terminology that allow to explore new becoming and non-obvious to the previous study of optics reality. The socialization in a transitive society is not only a number of features and properties, directly related to changes in the culture and way of life, but is a complex construct, implying an analytical approach: the selection in this construct different facets of situational and additional terminological differentiation of the study of social and psychological reality. Modern socialization of the younger generations implies the ability to design the identity and active development of the living environment; bearing not only on the cultural heritage and progressive civilizational trends, but also the release of counterproductive social representations and historical traditions. An important role is played here by the correlation with the processes of socialization of cultural-historical context, namely in view of the modernization of resources (personal, national, general culture), meaning the modernization transformation of society and the individual in the present. Risk complexity and diversity of socialization processes in transitive society becomes the fact that the socialization of the individual at the same level of culture and within the same social group can coexist or conflict with no-socialization person with other levels of culture and other social groups. The problem for the psychological study of the features of socialization of children and adolescents, as well as the phenomena of re-socialization in a transformed society remains marginalized transition comprehension mechanisms of social and cultural movements and subcultures in the main line of development of culture. In this regard, the study of the phenomena of socialization requires the addition of historical and evolutionary strategies of methodological and analytical subject (bringing to the fore the subjectivity of the changes in the historical dynamics of the society), and the historical and genetic approach cultural-analytical, taking into account first of all non-obvious trends in intellectual and socio-cultural movements.

Keywords: methodology, cultural-analytical approach, culture, transitive society, socialization, individualization, latent tradition and culture movement, transformation into modernity, socialization of the younger generation

 

Funding
The work was perfomed within a state task, project 1752.


References

Andreeva G.M. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya. Moscow: Nauka, 1994. (in Russian)

Arkhangelskii A. Rasparennaya sovest'. Kolta.ru, 2016. http://www.colta.ru/articles/society/12330 (in Russian)

Asmolov A.G. Optika prosveshcheniya: sotsiokul'turnaya perspektiva. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 2012.(in Russian)

Asmolov A.G. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2015, 8(40), 1. http://psystudy.ru (in Russian)

Asmolov A.G. Psikhologiya lichnosti. Kul'turno-istoricheskie ponimanie razvitiya cheloveka. Moscow: Smysl, 2007. (in Russian)

Bannikov K. Otechestvennye zapiski, 2013, Vol. 1. (in Russian)

Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost'. St. Petersburg:  Piter, 2008. (in Russian)

Bek U. Obshchestvo riska. Na puti k drugomu modernu. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000. (in Russian)

Belinskaya E.P. Chelovek v izmenyayushchemsya mire – sotsial'no-psikhologicheskaya perspektiva. Moscow: Prometei, 2005. (in Russian)

Bryman A. Barriers to Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2007, 1(1), 8–22.

Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 2006, 6(1), 97–113.

Creswell J.W. A Framework for Design. In.: J.W. Creswell (Ed.), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2003. http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1334586.files/2003_Creswell_A%20Framework%20for%20Design.pdf

De Lisle J. The Benefits and Challenges of Mixing Methods and Methodologies. Caribbean Curriculum, 2011, Vol. 18, 87–120.

Denzin N. Sociological methods: A sourcebook. New Brunswick: Transaction publishers, 1970.

Denzin N., Sridhar M.S. Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 2010, 16(6), 419–427.

Fedotova V.G. Khoroshee obshchestvo. Moscow: Progress-traditsiya, 2005. (in Russian)

Giddens E. Uskol'zayushchii mir. Kak globalizatsiya menyaet nashu zhizn'. Moscow: Ves' mir 2004. (in Russian)

Guseltseva M.S. Kul'turnaya psikhologiya: metodologiya, istoriya, perspektivy. Moscow: Prometei, 2007. (in Russian)

Guseltseva M.S. PhD dissertation (Psychology). Moscow, 2015a. http://www.pirao.ru/images/thesis-presentations/GuseltsevaMS/GuseltsevaMS-thesis.pdf (in Russian)

Guseltseva M.S. Obrazovatel'naya Politika, 2015b, 1(67), 29–44. (in Russian)

Guseltseva M.S. Obrazovatel'naya Politika, 2015c, 2(68), 6–26. (in Russian)

Guseltseva M.S. Obrazovatel'naya Politika, 2015d, 4(70), 12–32. (in Russian)

Guseltseva M.S. Psikhologіya osobistostі: Naukovii teoretiko-metodologіchnii і prikladnii psikhologіchnii zhurnal, 2013, 1(4), 20–38. (in Russian)

Inozemtsev V.L. Poteryannoe desyatiletie. Moscow: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovanii, 2013. (in Russian)

Inozemtsev V.L. Sovremennoe postindustrial'noe obshchestvo: priroda, protivorechiya, perspektivy. Moscow: Logos, 2000. (in Russian)

Kalinin I. (Ed.), "Kholodnaya grazhdanskaya voina". Raskol vengerskogo obshchestva. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2009. (in Russian)

Kornilova T.V. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2014, 7(36), 2. http://psystudy.ru (in Russian)

Kornilova T.V. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2015, 8(40), 3. http://psystudy.ru (in Russian)

Landram Dzh.N. Chetyrnadtsat' geniev, kotorye lomali pravila. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, 1997. (in Russian)

Leontiev D.A. Voprosy Psikhologii, 2011, Vol. 1, 3–27. (in Russian)

Leontiev D.A. Voprosy Psikhologii, 2016, Vol. 3, 3–15. (in Russian)

Levinson K. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2010, Vol. 105. http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2010/105/le6.html (in Russian)

Lotman Yu.M. Nepredskazuemye mekhanizmy kul'tury. Tallinn: TLU Press, 2010. (in Russian)

Martsinkovskaya T.D. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2012, 5(26), 7, http://psystudy.ru (in Russian)

Martsinkovskaya T.D. Voprosy Psikhologii, 2013, Vol. 4, 57–68. (in Russian)

Martsinkovskaya T.D. Problema sotsializatsii v istoriko-geneticheskoi paradigme. Moscow: Smysl, 2015. (in Russian)

Marchenko A.T. Moi pokazaniya. Moscow: Moskovskii rabochii, 1991. (in Russian)

Maslou A. Dal'nie predely chelovecheskoi psikhiki. St. Petersburg: Evraziya, 1997. (in Russian)

Melnikova O.T., Khoroshilov D.A. Voprosy Psikhologii, 2014, Vol. 1, 28–37. (in Russian)

Moren E. Vestnik Evropy, 2012, Vol. 33. http://magazines.russ.ru/vestnik/2012/33/m30-pr.html (in Russian)

Nikolaeva U.G. Nezavisimaya gazeta, 2016, http://www.ng.ru/stsenarii/2016-10-25/9_6843_middleages.html (in Russian)

Paneyakh E.L. Vedomosti, 2015, Vol. 3855, http://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2015/06/19/597024-sotsialnaya-dezorganizatsiya (in Russian)

Petranovskaya L.V. Lyuboi totalitarnyi rezhim pervym delom razrushaet sem'yu, 2016, https://openrussia.org/post/view/14028/ (in Russian)

Petranovskaya L.V. Travmy pokolenii. Soznatel'no.ru, 2013, http://www.soznatelno.ru/otnosheniya/travmy-pokoleniiy.html (in Russian)

Poddyakov A.N. Komplikologiya: sozdanie razvivayushchikh, diagnostiruyushchikh i destruktivnykh trudnostei. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki, 2014. (in Russian)

Porta D. della, Keating M. (Eds.). Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Porta D. della, Keating M. In Defence of Pluralism. Combining approaches in the social sciences. International Congress of Political Science. Santiago de Chile, 2009. http://paperroom.ipsa.org/papers/paper_1051.pdf

Prokhorova I.D. Svetskoe obshchestvo i traditsionalistskoe soznanie. Pochemu nash mir takov, kak on est'? Priroda. Chelovek. Obshchestvo. Moscow: Corpus; Snob Media, 2015. (in Russian)

Rauning G. Iskusstvo i revolyutsiya: khudozhestvennyi aktivizm v dolgom dvadtsatom veke. St. Petersburg: Evropeiskii universitet, 2012. (in Russian)

Sergienko E.A. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2012, 5(24), 1. http://psystudy.ru. (in Russian)

Sergienko E.A. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2016, 9(48), 4. http://psystudy.ru (in Russian)

Sergienko E.A. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2011, 32(1), 120–132. (in Russian)

Shulman E.M. Prakticheskaya politologiya: posobie po kontaktu s real'nost'yu. Moscow: Izdatel'skie resheniya, 2015. (in Russian)

Solzhenitsyn A.I. "Bodalsya telenok s dubom". Ocherki literaturnoi zhizni. Parizh: YMCA-PRESS, 1975. (in Russian)

Tashakkori A., Creswell J.W. The New Era of Mixed Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2007, 1(1), 3–7.

Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998.

Terrell S.R. Mixed-Methods Research Methodologies. The Qualitative Report, 2012, 17(1), 254–280.

Thurmond V.A. The Point of Triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 2001, 33(3), 253–258.

Vershinin S.E. Zhizn' – eto nadezhda. Vvedenie v filosofiyu Ernsta Blokha. Ekaterinburg: Gumanitarnyi universitet, 2001. (in Russian)

Yakovenko I.G. Mir cherez prizmu kul'tury. Kul'turologiya i rossievedenie. Moscow: Znanie, 2013. (in Russian)

Zhuravlev L.A., Sergienko E.A. (Eds.). Razrabotka i realizatsiya printsipa razvitiya v sovremennoi psikhologii. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2016. (in Russian)

Znakov V.V. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2015, 8(42), 12. http://psystudy.ru (in Russian)

Znakov V.V. Psikhologiya ponimaniya mira cheloveka. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2016. (in Russian)

Received 15 May 2016. Date of publication: 35 December 2016.

About author

Guseltseva Marina S. Ph.D., Associate Professor, Leading Research Associate, Psychological Institute, ul. Mokhovaya, 9–4, 125009 Moscow, Russia.
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Suggested citation

Guseltseva M.S. Theoretical and methodological foundations of the harmonization processes of socialization, individualization and identity of the person in the conditions of transitional society. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2016, Vol. 9, No. 50, p. 6. http://psystudy.ru (in Russian, abstr. in English).

Permanent URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/eng/2016v9n50e/1369-guseltseva50e.html

Back to top >>

Related Articles